Malwinder Kang Slams GMADA Over Demolitions, Calls Authority a “Loot Ka Kendra”

Chandigarh, August 27, 2026: Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Anandpur Sahib MP Malwinder Singh Kang has launched a strong attack on the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) over the demolition of shops, accusing the authority of selective action and demanding that its functioning be investigated.

Kang claimed that he had a heated conversation with GMADA Chief Administrator Sandeep Rishi and alleged that the authority was acting against small shopkeepers and labourers while people with money and influence were allegedly being spared. These allegations are Kang's claims and have not been independently established.

Kang Questions GMADA Demolition Drive

The controversy centres on the demolition of shops in the GMADA area.

According to Kang, he received a call from Sandeep Rishi regarding the demolition action. Kang said he questioned why shops were being targeted and later reached the spot to speak to officials.

Kang said officials told him that the demolition drive was being carried out in compliance with High Court directions.

“I Abused GMADA Chief”

Speaking about his conversation with Rishi, Kang openly acknowledged that the exchange became heated.

Kang said he used abusive language during the conversation and told the GMADA chief that if he wanted to continue functioning in the area, the authority must operate within the law and according to established rules.

The remarks have added a political dimension to the ongoing dispute over the demolition drive.

Kang Calls GMADA a “Loot Ka Kendra”

Kang used strong language against the development authority, calling GMADA a “loot ka kendra” and questioning its functioning.

He alleged that poor shopkeepers and workers who depend on small businesses for their livelihoods were being targeted, while those with greater financial resources were allegedly able to avoid action.

The allegations regarding bribery and selective enforcement require investigation and verification by the competent authorities.

Demands Investigation Into Officials

Kang demanded an investigation into the officials responsible for the demolition-related decisions.

He also called for the transfer of clerical-level staff, alleging that corruption within the system needed to be addressed.

The AAP leader said government authorities should operate transparently and ensure that enforcement is carried out according to the law rather than selectively.

Appeal to CM Bhagwant Mann

Kang also appealed to Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann to take note of the situation.

He argued that while the government is working on public-welfare initiatives, alleged arbitrary action and corruption at the administrative level can damage public confidence in the government.

Kang called for corrective action against officials if any wrongdoing is established.

What Did GMADA Say?

According to Kang's account, GMADA officials cited High Court orders as the basis for the demolition action.

However, the allegations made by Kang about selective enforcement and corruption are separate claims and would need to be examined by the relevant authorities.

No conclusion about misconduct should be drawn unless the allegations are formally investigated and established.

Why the Issue Matters

The dispute has raised broader questions about the balance between urban development, enforcement of planning regulations and the livelihood of small traders.

While authorities have the responsibility to enforce planning and land-use regulations, affected shopkeepers and business owners often seek clarity regarding notices, legal procedures and rehabilitation or alternative arrangements.

The controversy has therefore become both an administrative and political issue.

Key Highlights
Malwinder Singh Kang criticised GMADA over shop demolitions.
Kang said he had a heated exchange with GMADA Chief Administrator Sandeep Rishi.
He acknowledged using abusive language during the conversation.
Kang accused GMADA of selective action against poor shopkeepers.
He called GMADA a “loot ka kendra.”
Kang demanded an investigation into the functioning of officials.
He also sought the transfer of certain clerical-level staff.
GMADA officials, according to Kang's account, cited High Court directions for the demolition action.
Allegations of bribery and selective enforcement remain unverified.
What Happens Next?

The focus is now likely to shift towards the legality of the demolitions, the documents and notices issued to affected businesses, and whether the allegations raised by Kang lead to any official inquiry.

If an investigation is ordered, it could determine whether enforcement procedures were followed and whether there was any evidence of selective action or corruption.

Conclusion

The confrontation between Malwinder Singh Kang and GMADA Chief Sandeep Rishi has brought renewed attention to the demolition of shops in the GMADA area.

While Kang has strongly criticised the authority and demanded an investigation, the allegations concerning corruption and selective enforcement remain claims that require verification.

The issue highlights the need for transparent enforcement, adherence to court and administrative orders, and protection of lawful livelihoods while carrying out urban development measures.

NewsDesk7.com will continue to track developments in the GMADA demolition controversy and report verified updates.